Os dois métodos da teoria econômica

dc.contributor.authorBresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos
dc.contributor.unidadefgvEscolas::EESPpor
dc.date.accessioned2008-10-16T19:10:15Z
dc.date.available2008-10-16T19:10:15Z
dc.date.issued2003-07-01
dc.date.submitted2003-07-01T00:00:00Z
dc.description.abstractEconomic theory deals with a complex reality, which may be seen through various perspectives, using different methods. Economics’ three major branches – development economics, macroeconomics, and microeconomics – cannot be unified because the former two use preferentially a historical-deductive, while the later, an essentially hypothetical-deductive or aprioristic method. Smith, Marx and Keynes used an essentially the method of the new historical facts, while Walras, an aprioristic one to devise the neoclassical general equilibrium model. The historical-deductive method looks for the new historical facts that condition the economic reality. Economic theory remains central, but it is more modest, or less general, as the economist that adopt principally this method is content to analyze stabilization and growth in the framework of a given historical phase or moment of the economic process. As a trade off, his models are more realistic and conducive to more effective economic policies, as long as he is not required to previously abandon, one by one, the unrealistic assumptions required by a excessively general theory, but already starts from more realistic oneseng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10438/1941
dc.language.isopor
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTextos para discussão - EESP ; 127por
dc.subject.areaEconomiapor
dc.subject.bibliodataEconomiapor
dc.subject.classificationB4por
dc.titleOs dois métodos da teoria econômicapor
dc.typeWorking Papereng
Arquivos
Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
TD127.pdf
Tamanho:
174.41 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format