From grobal management to glocal management: Latin American perspectives as a counter-dominant management epistemology

dc.contributor.affiliationFGV
dc.contributor.authorSilveira, Rafael Alcadipani da
dc.contributor.authorRosa, Alexandre Reis
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-10T13:36:07Z
dc.date.available2018-05-10T13:36:07Z
dc.date.issued2011-12
dc.descriptionConteúdo online de acesso restrito pelo editorpor
dc.description.abstractManagement is known as a global phenomenon. However, its global facade tends to mean that management knowledge and practices are usually created and developed in Western countriesmainly the United Statesto be transferred supposedly problem-free to other locations. This paper discusses how management has spread globally via Americanization, and is therefore a grobal phenomenon. From a Latin American perspective, this transfer can be problematic, especially as it tends to suppress locally developed knowledge and experiences. In denaturalizing grobal management, we propose glocal management as an alternative to the current Anglo-centric view of the field, and believe this new view can take into account hybridism and local realities. Copyright (c) 2010 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.eng
dc.description.abstractLa gestion est, cela va sans dire, un phénomène mondial. Cependant, par «mondial» on sous-entend que le savoir et les pratiques en gestion sont généralement créés et mis au point dans les pays occidentaux, notamment les États-Unis, avant d’être transposés, prétendument sans heurts, dans d’autres pays. Cet article analyse comment la gestion s’est répandue dans le monde via l’américanisation, d’où son caractère mandial (grobal). D’un point de vue latinoaméricain, un tel transfert peut être d’autant plus problé- matique qu’il tend à nier les savoirs et les expériences construits localement. Aussi procédons-nous à la dénaturalisation de la gestion mandiale. Nous proposons que la perspective anglocentrique qui domine dans le domaine actuellement soit remplacée par la gestion glocale. Cette dernière prend en compte l’hybridisme et les réalités locales. Copyright © 2010 ASAC. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.fre
dc.format.extentp. 453-466
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjas.165
dc.identifier.WoS000297926200009
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cjas.165
dc.identifier.issn0747-4938 / 1532-4168
dc.identifier.orcidAlcadipani, Rafael/0000-0001-5132-5380; Reis Rosa, Alexandre/0000-0003-0619-7433
dc.identifier.researcheridAlcadipani, Rafael/B-1573-2013
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10438/23245
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwelleng
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCanadian journal of administrative sciences-revue canadienne des sciences de l administrationeng
dc.rights.accessRightsrestrictedAccesseng
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectGlobal managementeng
dc.subjectAmericanizationeng
dc.subjectColonialismeng
dc.subjectManagement knowledgeeng
dc.subjectGlobalizationeng
dc.subjectEuropeeng
dc.subjectBrazileng
dc.subject.areaEconomiapor
dc.subject.bibliodataGlobalização - América Latinapor
dc.titleFrom grobal management to glocal management: Latin American perspectives as a counter-dominant management epistemologyeng
dc.typeArticle (Journal/Review)eng

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
000297926200009.pdf
Tamanho:
117.86 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição: