Parcerias inter-setoriais em contextos de mudança social: investigação do combate ao trabalho escravo no Brasil
Carregando...
Arquivos
Data
2018-03-14
Orientador(res)
Silveira, Rafael Alcadipani da
Métricas
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Resumo
This thesis presents an investigation of a cross-sector social partnership which aim is to eradicate slave labour in Brazil. To do such investigation, it was conducted field research over eighteen months in an organization that congregates players from the three sectors – private, public and third sector, and deploy mostly the private sector to promote decent work and to eradicate slavery. This research is inductive-oriented, so, according to this view, the fieldwork was began before the choice of the theoretical lens, following a recursive process in which the first fed the second and vice-versa as a cyclic and continued way to explore the field. Also, the qualitative approach guided this thesis, as this perspective has oriented the fieldwork and also the corpus analysis and the discussion of the case, and, therefore, it was carried out in-depth interview, field observations and notes, and use of written documents. The procedure of corpus treatment was conducted considering the procedures designated by grounded theory, and, therefore, through corpus codifications and categorizations. In this manner, it was built five big themes – episodes, arenas of relationships and counter-arenas, boundary spanners and conveners, capacity and power, and paradoxes. These big themes were discussed under the theoretical lens of CSSP (cross-sector social partnership) of which broader position is connected to interorganizational relationship approach. To this discussion, I built a theoretical framework able to involve debates emerged in the fieldwork, and, therefore, it follows a similar structure of the five big themes mentioned above. Lastly, this thesis contributes with three main groups of theoretical gaps that came from the existing debate in the CSSP literature, as these gaps are tried to be filled through the debate of social partnership and arenas, agents and organizational field, and tensions, capacities and paradoxes. These three groups are pervaded by concepts that were developed from the fieldwork, and also culminated in a broad concept, in terms of onto-epistemology, of ‘what is CSSP’.