Synergies and price trends in sequential auctions

dc.contributor.affiliationFGV
dc.contributor.authorMenezes, Flavio Marques
dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, P. K.
dc.contributor.unidadefgvEscolas::EPGEpor
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-13T15:23:22Z
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-23T18:58:22Z
dc.date.available2008-05-13T15:23:22Z
dc.date.available2010-09-23T18:58:22Z
dc.date.issued1999-10-01
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we consider sequential auctions where an individual’s value for a bundle of objects is either greater than the sum of the values for the objects separately (positive synergy) or less than the sum (negative synergy). We show that the existence of positive synergies implies declining expected prices. When synergies are negative, expected prices are increasing. There are several corollaries. First, the seller is indi¤erent between selling the objects simultaneously as a bundle or sequentially when synergies are positive. Second, when synergies are negative, the expected revenue generated by the simultaneous auction can be larger or smaller than the expected revenue generated by the sequential auction. In addition, in the presence of positive synergies, an option to buy the additional object at the price of the …rst object is never exercised in the symmetric equilibrium and the seller’s revenue is unchanged. Under negative synergies, in contrast, if there is an equilibrium where the option is never exercised, then equilibrium prices may either increase or decrease and, therefore, the net e¤ect on the seller’s revenue of the introduction of an option is ambiguous. Finally, we examine two special cases with asymmetric players. In the …rst case, players have distinct synergies. In this example, even if one player has positive synergies and the other has negative synergies, it is still possible for expected prices to decline. In the second case, one player wants two objects and the remaining players want one object each. For this example, we show that expected prices may not necessarily decrease as predicted by Branco (1997). The reason is that players with singleunit demand will generally bid less than their true valuations in the …rst period. Therefore, there are two opposing forces; the reduction in the bid of the player with multiple-demand in the last auction and less aggressive bidding in the …rst auction by the players with single-unit demand.eng
dc.identifier.issn0104-8910
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10438/390
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFundação Getulio Vargas. Escola de Pós-graduação em Economiapor
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEnsaios Econômicos;360por
dc.subjectSynergieseng
dc.subjectSequential auctionseng
dc.subjectIncreasing and decreasing expected pricespor
dc.subject.areaEconomiapor
dc.subject.bibliodataEconomiapor
dc.subject.bibliodataLeilões - Modelos econômicospor
dc.titleSynergies and price trends in sequential auctionseng
dc.typeWorking Papereng

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
1208.pdf
Tamanho:
321.56 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format